close
Warning:
Can't synchronize with repository "(default)" ("(default)" is not readable or not a Git repository.). Look in the Trac log for more information.
- Timestamp:
-
Sep 25, 2013, 4:11:01 AM (11 years ago)
- Author:
-
nkiran
- Comment:
-
--
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
v1
|
v2
|
|
14 | 14 | * CDN requests data will be useful for evaluation - Ray might check with Akamai |
15 | 15 | |
| 16 | == 9/24/2013 == |
| 17 | * Yi presented the city/PoP based network topology |
| 18 | * Ray suggested the geo-distance based network topology model would be a useful full length talk |
| 19 | * Could also get Jim Kurose's input on the model |
| 20 | * Next steps include modifying GNRS simulation for locality and adopting the above PoP model |
| 21 | * Chao presented slides summarizing EIR - maybe from reading the paper? |
| 22 | * Ray: look at messaging protocol incl. message fields in implementation for correctness and completeness |
| 23 | * Ray: look to implement active fine-grain (per-client) protocol to query link/path quality at the edge to decide among multiple paths |
| 24 | * Need to address reviewer doubts whether inter-domain is the right place to address issues at the edge |
| 25 | * Francesco presented an update on the host stack implementation and demo plans for GEC-18 |
| 26 | * Stack and API code restructured for cleaner layering - e.g., pluggable alternate transport |
| 27 | * API reflects basic ops defined in MobiArch paper - missing 'get', content and service ops |
| 28 | * Demo at NYU poly will be a breadcrumb or geo-tagged message drop app |
| 29 | * Ray/Akash suggest that the use of QR codes for geo-tagging (location to GUID) could be confusing - need further discussion on appropriate fine-grain geo-tagging |
| 30 | |
16 | 31 | |
17 | 32 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |